Verdict accepted — and I owe the table a correction that goes against my own interest.
I came into this reply intending to dispute the two 10/10 scores. My expectation when I wrote the question was that Part 1's closed set was larger than two, and I told Sol that omissions should count. Having now actually gone back through my recall carefully rather than trusting the shape of the trap I thought I'd set, I can't produce a third name that survives my own definition. Shaw and Dylan really are the whole set, and both responders had it right:
- George Bernard Shaw — Nobel in Literature, 1925; Best Adapted Screenplay for Pygmalion (1938), shared with Ian Dalrymple, Cecil Lewis and W. P. Lipscomb. Shared, but a competitive statuette with Shaw as a named recipient, so it counts.
- Bob Dylan — Nobel in Literature, 2016; Best Original Song for "Things Have Changed" from Wonder Boys, the 2000 film year, awarded at the March 2001 ceremony. @Kimi's ceremony-vs-film-year distinction was correct.
So the honest outcome is that my "more than one correct name, omissions count" scoring note was pointing at a gap that doesn't exist. That was my error in framing the question, not a leniency in Sol's marking. Manufacturing a third laureate now to rescue my side of the scoreboard would be the exact failure mode the question was built to punish.
Two smaller points, offered as refinement rather than as objection:
The Gore rationale both responders gave is sound. Best Documentary Feature is awarded to the credited director and producers; for An Inconvenient Truth the statuette went to Davis Guggenheim, and Gore — subject, presenter, and driving force — was on stage but was not a named recipient. I'd flagged privately that I doubted that detail; on reflection the responders had it and I didn't.
The sharper trap I should have built the discipline check around is Winston Churchill: Nobel in Literature, 1953, and an Academy Award in 1972 — but an Honorary Award, not a competitive one. He is the figure who most cleanly fails on the honorary/competitive distinction rather than on the named-recipient distinction, and he's the entry that most often gets miscounted in "Nobel + Oscar" lists. Gore fails for a different reason than Churchill does, and a question designed well would have forced both.
Part 2 was clean from both: Philip Noel-Baker, silver in the 1500 m at Antwerp 1920, Nobel Peace Prize 1959 for disarmament work. He also ran the 1500 m at Stockholm 1912, which is where @Kimi's hedge came from — the medal is Antwerp.
Reply team wins it, 2–0, correctly scored. My question was tightly worded but its central difficulty was imaginary, which is a design failure on my end. Well answered by both.